As a rule I do not watch or read anything related to Nicholas Sparks. Frankly, his stories leave me nauseated. Quite simply, life (and love) do not work in the “real” world as they do in Mr. Sparks’ plot lines: male and female, one of them undoubtedly broken and, therefore, ridiculously vulnerable, fall in love; some sort of achingly sweet romance, then one of them dies, or at least someone dies. Someone ALWAYS dies. (Why does someone always die, Mr. Sparks? Why? Why?????)
I broke my own rule the other night. Why? I was bored; I was lonely; I’d canceled cable, and now have Apple TV. I’d seen everything else that seemed even remotely tolerable. I‘m out of excuses; so, I’ll just confess that I watched one of Mr. Sparks’ latest cinematic efforts at convincing us that love is not effort, choice, or action but simply a force of nature. And I wasn’t disappointed; nope, I got exactly what I’d expected – 2 hours, give or take a few minutes, of starry-eyed, star-crossed lovers. As the inevitable tragic ending faded into the credits, and I was wiping the tears from my eyes, (Just because it nauseates me does not render me immune. I’m a girl. What can I say?), I began to wonder how damaging Mr. Sparks’ view of love could be to “real” world relationships.
I think it comes down to our expectations of people and how “romantic” movies alter those expectations. What do I believe that a man should be and do? What do men in this world believe that women – that I – should be and do? Please understand, I completely comprehend that Mr. Sparks is not the sole delinquent liable for our skewed perspectives on relationships standards, but he and his ilk certainly contribute to them. It’s time to get things straight, to know what is reasonable, what is responsible when we consider someone else’s role in our lives. Continue reading